Bill Tracker
based on: Profile: Colorado Coalition of Appraisers
Loading... Please Wait
You have 3 bills in your selected Profile
download to spreadsheet
download to pdf
download to docx
Notes about this profile:
Bill:
HB22-1036
|
Title: |
Improvement Location Certificate Real Estate Forms |
Votes | Votes all Legislators | Hearing Date | | Hearing Time | | Hearing Room | | Intro Date | 01/12/2022 | Description | Concerning a requirement that certain real estate commission-approved forms specify whether the real estate transaction on which a form is based concerns a land surveyor's inspection of the real estate. | History | Bill History | Save to Calendar | | Bill Subject | - Professions & Occupations | Bill Docs | Bill Documents | Sponsors (House and Senate) | Senate:
House: M. Snyder (D) M. Soper (R) | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (01/26/2022) | Full Text | Full Text of Bill | Lobbyists | Lobbyists | Position | Monitor | Category | | Comment | | Custom Summary | | Summary | The bill requires the real estate commission to promulgate rules
requiring that certain commission-approved forms require notification to buyers or tenants as to whether a real estate transaction is based upon a
land survey plat or an improvement location certificate.
Current law forbids designating or construing an improvement
location certificate as being a land survey plat or improvement survey plat. The bill clarifies that real estate documents and forms shall not designate or construe such a certificate as being a land or improvement survey plat.
| House Sponsors | M. Snyder (D) M. Soper (R) | Senate Sponsors | | House Committee | Business Affairs and Labor | Senate Committee | Business, Labor and Technology | Status | Senate Committee on Business, Labor, & Technology Postpone Indefinitely (04/11/2022) | Amendments | |
|
Bill:
HB22-1261
|
Title: |
Sunset Board Of Real Estate Appraisers |
Votes | Votes all Legislators | Hearing Date | | Hearing Time | | Hearing Room | | Intro Date | 02/24/2022 | Description | Concerning the continuation of the board of real estate appraisers, and, in connection therewith, implementing the recommendations contained in the 2021 sunset report by the department of regulatory agencies regarding the board of real estate appraisers. | History | Bill History | Save to Calendar | | Bill Subject | - Professions & Occupations | Bill Docs | Bill Documents | Sponsors (House and Senate) | Senate: K. Priola (D) C. Hansen (D) House: N. Ricks (D) | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (04/08/2022) | Full Text | Full Text of Bill | Lobbyists | Lobbyists | Position | Monitor | Category | | Comment | | Custom Summary | | Summary | Sunset Process - House Business Affairs and Labor
Committee. The bill implements the recommendations of the department
of regulatory agencies, as contained in the department's sunset review of the board of real estate appraisers (board), as follows:
Continues the board for 9 years, until September 1, 2031 (sections 1 and 2 of the bill);
Requires the board to adopt rules to authorize an exemption from compliance with the uniform standards of professional appraisal practice that would allow an appraiser to perform an evaluation instead of a full appraisal for a federally regulated financial institution and authorizes an appraiser to conduct an evaluation in accordance with the board's rules (sections 3 and 6);
Amends statute to comport with federal law, including updating the number of appraisers with which a licensed appraisal management company does business, updating the qualifications for licensure to require the minimum appraisal experience required by the Appraiser Qualifications Board of the Appraisal Foundation or its successor organization, clarifying the federal regulating authorities that regulate a financial institution exempted from state registration or licensure, and aligning the hours of continuing education required for reactivation of an inactive license with the number of hours required by the Appraiser Qualifications Board (sections 4 and 6 to 8);
Repeals the requirement that the board send letters of admonition by certified mail (sections 9 and 10);
Clarifies that fines are assessed on a per-violation basis and reduces the maximum penalty from $2,000 to $1,000, which maximum penalty applies to any violation (section 9); and
Directs the state treasurer to credit penalties and fines collected to the general fund instead of the division of real estate cash fund (section 5).
| House Sponsors | N. Ricks (D) | Senate Sponsors | K. Priola (D) C. Hansen (D) | House Committee | Business Affairs and Labor | Senate Committee | Business, Labor and Technology | Status | Governor Signed (06/02/2022) | Amendments | |
|
Bill:
SB22-119
|
Title: |
Conservation Easement Tax Credit |
Votes | Votes all Legislators | Hearing Date | | Hearing Time | | Hearing Room | | Intro Date | 02/03/2022 | Description | Concerning conservation easements, and, in connection therewith, allowing taxpayers who were previously denied a state income tax credit for donating conservation easements to claim an income tax credit for those donations if specified requirements are satisfied. | History | Bill History | Save to Calendar | | Bill Subject | - Fiscal Policy & Taxes- Natural Resources & Environment | Bill Docs | Bill Documents | Sponsors (House and Senate) | Senate: F. Winter (D) C. Simpson (R) House:
| Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (06/14/2022) | Full Text | Full Text of Bill | Lobbyists | Lobbyists | Position | Monitor | Category | | Comment | | Custom Summary | | Summary | The bill creates a new state income tax credit (new credit) for
certain taxpayers who were denied state income tax credits for conservation easements donated between 2000 and 2013 (original credit) if the federal internal revenue service allowed a federal income tax deduction for the same donation. A donation is eligible for the new credit only if the land subject to the donated conservation easement for which the original credits were disallowed was owned by the landowner, a family member of the landowner, or a trust or other legal entity controlled by the landowner or one or more members of the family of the landowner for not less than 3 consecutive years prior to the date of the donation.
The amount of the new credit is based upon the amount of the
original credit that could have been claimed at the time of the original donation based upon the value of the donation accepted by the internal revenue service; except that the fair market value of the land used to calculate the value of the new credit cannot exceed 250% of the donor's cost basis in the land subject to the donated conservation easement. The amount of the new credit is reduced by any amount that was allowed to be claimed against Colorado income tax or otherwise reinstated to the claimant of the original credit. The new credit is not refundable but may be carried forward or transferred in the same manner as the original credit. The department of revenue is required to make information about the new credit available online.
The bill establishes a process for applying to the division of
conservation to claim the new credit. If the original credit that was denied was transferred to another taxpayer as transferee, the bill provides a process for all parties to the transaction to submit a mutual application to claim the new credit or, if there is objection, an ombudsman process to resolve disputes about the distribution of the credit.
| House Sponsors | | Senate Sponsors | F. Winter (D) C. Simpson (R) | House Committee | | Senate Committee | Finance | Status | Senate Committee on Appropriations Postpone Indefinitely (05/10/2022) | Amendments | |
|
|
|
back to top |